Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Sentencing decision for aggravated assault and disarming a peace officer, with one obstruction count stayed under Kienapple and consecutive custody terms imposed.
Given the offender’s significant prior record, the facts (loaded restricted firearm with obliterated serial number and ammunition in a rental vehicle while under a prohibition not to drive), and sentencing principles of denunciation, deterrence and separation, the court imposed 2.5 years custody for s.95, a consecutive 1 year custody for s.117.01(3)(a), and 45 days concurrent for s.145; remand of 706 days was credited at 1.5:1 to 1059 days producing a remaining custodial balance of 219 days; ancillary orders of 24 months probation with reporting and counselling, lifetime firearm prohibition u…
Source excerpt
Sentencing reasons in R. v. Campbell, a manslaughter with a firearm case, where the court accepted a joint submission and imposed five years’ imprisonment plus ancillary orders.
Sentencing for assault with a weapon and dangerous driving arising from a vehicle incident at a Victoria protest. The court imposed 12 months’ imprisonment, concurrent 30 days, and probation.
Sentence for sexual assault of a 15-year-old: 10 months' imprisonment, followed by two years' probation and ancillary orders including DNA, SOIRA registration, and a firearms ban.
Sentencing on sexual assault and transmitting child pornography resulted in 12 months plus 2 consecutive months, with probation and ancillary orders.
A.L. was sentenced to 15 months for sexual interference, with enhanced presentence credit reducing the balance to 94 days, plus two years’ probation and ancillary orders.
The court sentenced a youthful first-time offender for multiple fentanyl and cocaine trafficking-related offences, imposing 18 months and 4 days plus probation.
The mandatory minimum of 90 days did not materially exceed the bottom of the applicable sentencing range for this offender given the gravity and circumstances; a 90-day custodial sentence is proportionate and not grossly disproportionate, so the court declined to consider the constitutional challenge under s.12 on the basis of reasonably foreseeable circumstances and imposed the 90-day sentence with ancillary orders.
Source excerpt
Sentencing reasons in a child sexual assault case. The court rejected a suspended sentence, preferred the Crown expert on reoffending risk, and imposed six months' imprisonment plus probation and ancillary orders.
Explore more
