Zawilski v. Cogeco Connexion Inc.
The Tribunal granted the confidentiality order under s.52(1)(c) CHRA applying the Sherman (Estate) threeâpart test: it found the documents were contractually protected and treated as confidential, disclosure would pose a real and substantial risk to important public interests (protection of confidential contractual information and competitive market integrity), no reasonable alternatives would prevent that risk, and the benefits of sealing outweigh the harm to open court values. Therefore the specified documents are sealed and subject to confidentiality conditions.
Source excerpt
- Confidentiality order
- Open court principle
- Section 52 chra
- Duty to accommodate
- Described video accessibility
- Nonâdisclosure agreements