Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Leave to appeal an arbitral award was dismissed because the appellant raised no question of law; the GAAP-based liability findings were treated as factual.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Hudson’s Bay’s application for leave to appeal an arbitration award on rent, holding the arbitrator did address the time-adjustment issue.
Appeal dismissed. The Court held the proposed appeal from the CRT raised mixed fact and law, not a question of law under s. 56.5 of the CRTA.
Appeal dismissed from the refusal of leave to appeal a CRT decision. The Court held the proposed appeal raised no question of law and costs followed.
Leave to appeal was denied because the proposed question of law did not have significance to the administration of justice beyond the four corners of the case and the court was not persuaded there was a clear error in the lower courts' decisions.
Source excerpt
The Court concluded it was not persuaded that there were any clear errors on questions of law that warrant consideration by this court and therefore denied leave to appeal.
Source excerpt
The appeal was dismissed because the appellants failed to identify any question of the Board's jurisdiction or any error of law as required by s.30 of the Utility and Review Board Act; absent such issues, the Court will not disturb the Board's order.
Source excerpt
Leave to appeal was denied because the appellant's arguments were limited to alleged misapprehensions of the evidence (factual issues) and did not raise a question of law of importance beyond the individual case; appellate courts will not retry factual determinations.
Source excerpt
Leave to appeal was denied because the appellant accepted the proposed appeal did not raise a question of law of broader significance and failed to demonstrate that the trial judge committed any error, let alone a clear error of law.
Source excerpt
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the Court found no question of law and no matter of public importance was raised, and it refused to consider a ground that was raised for the first time in the supplementary Notice of Appeal.
Source excerpt
Explore more
