Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a TRV refusal, finding the officer’s bare reasons failed to engage with the applicants’ financial evidence.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a TRV refusal, finding the officer’s GCMS notes were conclusory and did not show a discernable chain of reasoning under Vavilov.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of an IRCC refusal of an open work permit, finding the officer unreasonably ignored evidence of fixed deposits supporting the applicant’s finances.
The Federal Court allowed judicial review of a PRRA refusal, finding the officer unreasonably failed to analyze central evidence that the applicant had been targeted in Nicaragua.
The Federal Court allowed judicial review of a PRRA refusal, set aside the October 7, 2022 decision, and remitted the matter for redetermination with the New Evidence.
The General Division breached procedural fairness by denying the claimant the opportunity to have counsel attend by alternate means and committed a legal error by treating a suspension for misconduct as a disqualification rather than a disentitlement; appeal allowed and matter remitted to the General Division for redetermination.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court quashed an RPD cessation decision, finding it unreasonably assessed subjective intent and failed to weigh relevant evidence under Galindo Camayo.
The Federal Court granted judicial review, finding the officer unreasonably failed to assess mental-health decompression and access to healthcare on return to Jamaica.
The General Division committed reversible errors of fact by (1) overlooking relevant and conflicting evidence regarding the dates and duration of the claimant's illness before extending the qualifying period and (2) relying on the Commission's preliminary calculations of insurable hours without obtaining a conclusive CRA ruling despite evidence of dispute; therefore the Appeal Division allowed the appeal and remitted the matter to the General Division for redetermination to allow proper consideration and any necessary CRA ruling.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court allowed judicial review, finding the CBSA’s refusal of duty drawback claims unreasonable because it failed to engage with Akme’s key submissions.
Explore more
