Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Federal Court found CRA benefit ineligibility decisions unreasonable and procedurally unfair, then quashed them and remitted the matter for redetermination.
The court held a CRT parking order was patently unreasonable because it required a strata to act beyond the Strata Property Act. The matter was remitted for reconsideration.
The Federal Court allowed Mr. Johnson’s judicial review, holding that he was not given the text of the written rule he was said to have disobeyed and remitting the matter.
The Supreme Court of British Columbia allowed judicial review of two Small Claims decisions, set aside the refusals to cancel default judgments, and remitted the matter for reconsideration.
La Cour fédérale accueille le contrôle judiciaire, juge le refus de super visa déraisonnable et renvoie l’affaire à un autre agent à Mexico pour réexamen.
Judicial review of an RCMP conduct appeal decision was allowed after the Court found an ex parte consultation on factual issues breached procedural fairness.
Judicial review was granted after the Court found the review panel misread s. 25 of the Mental Health Act and failed to assess current impairment at the hearing.
The appeal is dismissed because the Appellant failed, on a balance of probabilities, to establish that she is a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection: credible country‑conditions evidence and local data for Fuqing, Fujian indicate low risk to unregistered Protestant practice; the family‑planning evidence does not show a current serious risk of forced sterilization and submitted family‑planning documents and a birth certificate were found not genuine; credibility and documentary deficiencies fatally undermine the claim.
Source excerpt
The Federal Court allowed judicial review, finding the RAD unreasonably refused new evidence as irrelevant in a Venezuelan refugee claim and remitted the matter for reconsideration.
The court reviewed a WorkSafeBC ban on a lay advocate, found the decision reviewable, upheld the Board’s authority, but set it aside for unfairness.
Explore more
