Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional law 2026 FC 632

Best v. Racicot

The Federal Court dismissed Casey Best’s late motion to extend time and reopen a strike order, finding no sufficient basis to revisit the pleadings.

  • Charter s7 and s15 claims
  • Motion to strike (strike pleadings)
  • Extension of time under federal court rules
  • Reconsideration (rule 397)
  • Variance (rule 399)
  • Appeal of discretionary orders (rule 51)
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2026 NLCA 16

Abbott v. Musgrave Harbour (Town)

The case management judge did not err in principle or fact and did not fail to exercise discretion judicially in requiring the appellants to make submissions themselves; with time to prepare, detailed written materials already filed, allowance for joint submissions and supplementation, and the ability for Ms. Abbott to speak for Mr. Abbott if required, the judge's decision was fair and within discretion, so the appeal is dismissed.

  • Case management
  • Representation by non-lawyer
  • Self-represented litigants
  • Standard of review
  • Interlocutory applications
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2026 BCCA 46

Sefcikova v. Orca Realty Inc.

The general rule in s.44 of the Court of Appeal Act awards costs to the successful party; appellants failed to show any conduct in the appeal proceedings that would disentitle respondents to costs, and allegations of misconduct pertained to the trial court and were unsupported by the record, therefore respondents are entitled to costs.

  • Costs of appeal
  • Entitlement to costs
  • Self-represented litigants
  • Conduct of litigation
Read case analysis
Civil 2026 ONCA 76

Equifax Canada Co. v. Oh

The Court of Appeal for Ontario granted a motion to include motion transcripts in the appeal record and extended time to perfect the appeal after an unsworn affidavit issue.

  • Summary judgment
  • Transcript inclusion
  • Perfecting an appeal
  • Extensions of time
  • Self-represented litigants
  • Unsworn affidavit
Read case analysis
Family law 2026 ONCA 29

Carter v. Carter

The Court of Appeal dismissed a family law appeal from a contempt finding, a 90-day jail sentence, and financial orders, holding the procedure was fair and the injunction covered new accounts.

  • Contempt of court
  • Mareva injunction
  • Financial disclosure
  • Custodial sentence
  • Self-represented litigants
  • Right against self-incrimination
Read case analysis
Privacy law 2025 FC 1941

Noble v. Synergy Credit Union Ltd.

The Federal Court ordered the self-represented applicant to pay the respondent $500 in lump sum costs, after weighing Rule 400(3) factors and both parties’ conduct.

  • Pipeda s.14
  • Federal courts rules rule 400(3)
  • Tariff b costs assessment
  • Self-represented litigants
  • Functus officio
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Defamation 2025 BCSC 2244

David v. Song

Assessment of special costs after trial in a neighbour dispute. The registrar awarded the plaintiffs $335,000 inclusive of taxes and disbursements and declined further document production.

  • Special costs
  • Easement
  • Injunctive relief
  • Self-represented litigants
  • Apology act
  • Special-costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 2025 BCSC 1601

Cao v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

The court struck Tao Jiang’s counterclaim in full, finding it disclosed no reasonable claim, was vexatious, and partly duplicated claims in a related family action.

  • Striking pleadings
  • Abuse of process
  • Rescission
  • Emotional distress damages
  • Self-represented litigants
  • Striking-pleadings
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2025 BCCA 252

R. v. Cavanaugh

The Court of Appeal dismissed appeals from criminal contempt convictions for breaching a Trans Mountain injunction, rejecting Indigenous-law, bias, disclosure, and actus reus arguments.

  • Mens rea
  • Colour of right
  • Subpoenas
  • Collateral attack on court orders
  • Jurisdiction
  • Injunction enforcement
Read case analysis
Family law 2025 ONCA 453

Hendriks v. Hendriks

Because the appellant succeeded on most issues on appeal and the respondent failed to prove his settlement offers produced an outcome as good as the appellate result, the appellant is entitled to costs of the appeal and the motion; the motion judge erred in finding the appellant unreasonable and the motion judge’s costs order is reversed.

  • Costs
  • Spousal support
  • Offers to settle
  • Self‑represented litigants
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.