Mehta v. Lally
The application to set aside the Hughes Order was dismissed because the defendant was guilty of wilful default in not attending or taking protective steps, the application was timely but the defendant failed to demonstrate a meritorious defence or provide evidence countering allegations of forged documents and non-compliance, and allowing the order to be set aside would prejudice the plaintiffs; therefore the strike order and consequential default judgment remain intact.
Source excerpt
- Setting aside default judgment
- Rule 22-7 enforcement
- Trial management conference compliance
- Service of orders
- Wilful default