Canada Case Law

R. v. Z.A.

Court

Supreme Court of Nova Scotia

After applying Friesen and Sheppard, weighing aggravating factors (young victim, father‑daughter trust, duration, frequency, escalation to penetration, severe psychological harm, confinement) against mitigation (first offender, pro‑social history, compliance with conditions, health issues), the court imposed an aggregate custodial sentence of eight years (individual sentences: s.155 incest 10 years; s.151 sexual interference 7 years concurrent; s.173(2) indecent act 2 years concurrent; s.279(2) unlawful confinement 2 years concurrent, reduced to 8 years for totality) and granted the Crown's a…

Source excerpt

• Child sexual abuse
• Incest
• Sexual interference
• Ancillary orders
• Section 161 prohibition
• Sentencing principles (friesen/sheppard)

Read case analysis

R. v. F.J.J.

Court

British Columbia Court of Appeal

Although the appellant's grounds surpass the 'not frivolous' threshold and warrant consideration of reviewability, enforceability outweighs reviewability because the offence was very serious, the sentence was substantial (4.5 years), there are residual safety concerns from the appellant's history of violence against intimate female partners, and the proposed interprovincial release plan with an out-of‑province surety did not provide sufficient confidence in enforceability and supervision; accordingly, a reasonable member of the public would lose confidence if the appellant were released and t…

Source excerpt

• Bail pending appeal
• Public interest criterion
• Enforceability vs reviewability
• Sexual interference
• Motive to fabricate
• Credibility assessment

Read case analysis

R. v. Baird

Court

Supreme Court of British Columbia

Although the judge found the complainant probably truthful and the accused not fully credible, a material inconsistency in the complainant's prior police statement about the mechanics of the touching ('put his hands down my pants') compared with her trial account, combined with plausible exculpatory testimony from the accused, produced a reasonable doubt; therefore the Crown failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and the accused was acquitted.

Source excerpt

• Sexual interference
• Sexual assault
• Credibility assessment
• Reasonable doubt
• Child witness testimony

Read case analysis

R. v. Khawaja

Court

Court of Appeal for Ontario

Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed Umair Khawaja’s conviction appeal and upheld his seven-year sentence for sexual offences against a 15-year-old complainant.

• Child luring
• Sexual interference
• Sexual assault
• W.(d.) assessment
• Delay in reasons
• Kienapple stay

Read case analysis

R. v. R.J.

Court

Court of Appeal for Ontario

Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed a criminal conviction appeal, holding the trial judge properly assessed credibility, fabrication, W.(D.), and motive-to-lie arguments.

• Sexual assault
• Sexual interference
• Credibility assessment
• Fabrication of evidence
• Motive to lie
• W.(d.) framework

Read case analysis

R. v. S.T.R.

Court

Supreme Court of British Columbia

The Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each charged offence because key allegations were undermined by material inconsistencies, implausibilities, lack of corroboration on central facts, and acceptable exculpatory evidence from the accused that raised reasonable doubt; accordingly the accused was acquitted on all counts.

Source excerpt

• Sexual assault
• Sexual interference
• Sexual exploitation
• Uttering threats
• Witness credibility and reliability

Read case analysis

R. v. Vannoordennen

Court

Court of Appeal for Ontario

The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeal, corrected a sentencing arithmetic error, and varied an overbroad internet prohibition order.

• Sexual interference
• Sexual assault
• Child pornography (child sexual abuse and exploitation material)
• Credibility and demeanour
• Internet prohibition order s.161(1)(d)
• Consecutive sentencing s.718.3(7)

Read case analysis

R. v. C.M.

Court

Court of Appeal for Ontario

The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed an ineffective-assistance appeal in a sexual assault and sexual interference case, finding no basis for the claimed prejudice.

• Sexual assault
• Sexual interference
• Ineffective assistance of counsel
• S.276 application
• Mode of trial election
• Right to testify

Read case analysis

R. v. Hallwachs

Court

British Columbia Court of Appeal

The trial judge did not misapprehend the evidence: the complainant's prior police statement was ambiguous and not adopted as true at trial; it was open on the evidence to infer the birthday party occurred before August 20; absence of the accused on August 20 was not a true alibi given the offences spanned 18 months and did not undermine the cogent overall credibility assessment; therefore convictions stand.

Source excerpt

• Sexual assault
• Sexual interference
• Sexual exploitation
• Credibility assessment
• Alibi
• Publication ban

Read case analysis

R. v. McElligott

Court

Court of Appeal for Ontario

Ontario Court of Appeal upheld convictions for sexual assault and sexual interference, finding the trial judge’s credibility reasons sufficient. The sexual assault conviction was stayed under Kienapple.

• Sexual assault
• Sexual interference
• Sufficiency of reasons
• Kienapple stay
• Publication ban
• Sufficiency-of-reasons

Read case analysis