Sign in
Canada Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Canada Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

Canada decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Immigration law 2024 FC 1489

Talukder v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an Immigration Division inadmissibility finding against a BNP member, but certified a question on specific intent.

  • Inadmissibility
  • Terrorism
  • Specific intent
  • Membership in organization
  • Credibility findings
  • Non-refoulement
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2024 FC 968

Anam v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an IAD inadmissibility decision, finding it reasonably applied Suresh, Vavilov, and specific-intent principles.

  • Inadmissibility under irpa s.34(1)(f)
  • Definition of terrorism (suresh)
  • Standard of review (vavilov)
  • Specific intent
  • Membership in terrorist organization
  • Irpa-s-34-inadmissibility
Read case analysis
Immigration law 2024 FC 967

Hamid v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Federal Court dismissed judicial review of an IRPA s. 34 inadmissibility decision, finding the IAD reasonably applied Suresh and properly assessed BNP membership and specific intent.

  • Inadmissibility
  • Membership to organization
  • Terrorism definition
  • Specific intent
  • Judicial review
  • Certification of questions
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 2142

R. v. Gregory-Allen

The accused was found guilty of break and enter after the court held his intoxication evidence did not raise a reasonable doubt about intent to steal.

  • Break and enter
  • Specific intent
  • Intoxication and mens rea
  • Credibility assessment (r. v. w.d.)
  • Statutory presumption s.348(2)
  • Break-and-enter
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 BCSC 2534

R. v. Cook

The court found Renn Broe Cook guilty of break and enter with intent, holding the Crown proved specific intent to commit criminal harassment despite some evidence of mental disturbance.

  • Break and enter
  • Mens rea
  • Specific intent
  • Criminal harassment
  • Indictment sufficiency
  • Authentication of electronic evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2023 NSPC 35

R. v. MacEvoy

Although s.601 permits amendment to conform to the evidence, the court must refuse an amendment that would prejudice the accused or result in injustice under the criteria in s.604(4); here amendment from 'intent to endanger life' to 'intent to wound' at the decision stage would unfairly shift the case the accused had to meet and potentially change the defence he chose to advance, therefore the court declined to amend and entered a not guilty verdict on Count 2 as charged.

  • Charge amendment
  • Specific intent
  • Section 244 criminal code
  • Section 601 criminal code
  • Self-defence
  • Aggravated assault
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 ONCA 740

R. v. Tekin

The trial judge's factual findings that the appellant manipulated a young, vulnerable, infatuated complainant and made his affection conditional on her performing escort work for his financial benefit supported a reasonable inference that he had the specific intent to exploit her; therefore the conviction for human trafficking was upheld.

  • Human trafficking
  • Exploitation
  • Specific intent
  • Sexual offences
  • Child pornography
  • Publication ban
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2022 YKCA 3

R. v. Sheepway

The Yukon Court of Appeal dismissed Darryl Sheepway’s appeal from a second-degree murder conviction, finding no reversible error in the trial judge’s treatment of intent, evidence, or expert rebuttal.

  • Homicide
  • Second-degree murder
  • Mens rea
  • Specific intent
  • Intoxication defence
  • Common-sense inference
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 BCSC 1739

R. v. Lewis

Court of Appeal? No. The British Columbia Supreme Court acquitted Kerryann Lewis of first degree murder, finding the Crown failed to prove an unlawful act beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • Murder (first/second degree)
  • Specific intent
  • Intoxication defence
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Expert evidence admissibility
  • Causation
Read case analysis
Criminal law 2021 ONCA 15

R. v. Tyrell

The conviction for attempted murder was set aside because, on the proven facts (a shot fired across approximately six metres in a dimly lit crowded room with no evidence of motive and a possible alternative target), the trial judge’s inference of specific intent to kill was not supported beyond a reasonable doubt; the conviction for assaulting a police officer was set aside because the trial judge expressly found no specific intent to assault and convicted on recklessness, but the offence requires intentional application of force; other firearm convictions were upheld and the aggravated assau…

  • Attempted murder
  • Assault of police
  • Specific intent
  • Eyewitness identification
  • Common-sense inference
  • Post-offence conduct
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Canada decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.