Canada (Attorney General) v. Soucy
The Federal Court reasonably concluded the Commission's decision was unintelligible and unreasonable because it failed to explain why the appointment decision premised on the manager's selection based on 'values' did not engage the merit principle in s.30 and therefore did not warrant investigation under s.66; the Federal Court of Appeal upheld that conclusion and dismissed the appeal.
Source excerpt
- Staffing and appointments
- Merit principle
- Investigation under section 66
- Manager discretion in selection
- Standard of review and deference