Sull v. Trevitt
The arbitrator's award was patently unreasonable because he based compensation on the alleged invalidity of the s.49 notice rather than applying s.51(2)'s statutory test of whether the stated purpose was accomplished within a reasonable time and failed to consider extenuating circumstances under s.51(3); the matter is remitted to the RTB to decide only whether the landlord or buyers should be excused under s.51(3) and to consider notice to the buyers and any abandonment of amounts above the statutory cap.
Source excerpt
- Compensation under s.51 rta
- Notice to end tenancy s.49 rta
- Standard of review - patent unreasonableness
- Extenuating circumstances s.51(3)
- Rtb jurisdiction and monetary cap s.58