Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Canada decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Because success on the summary applications and the Rule 10-1 transfer was mixed, and earlier applications had costs fixed in the cause that cannot be varied, the court exercised its discretion to depart from the default that costs follow the event and ordered that each party bear their own costs of the applications before the court.
Source excerpt
The stay application was dismissed because the appellant failed to meet the low merits threshold and the balance of convenience favoured the respondents; however, a limited temporary stay of the vacant possession order until March 31, 2026 was granted to mitigate relocation hardship.
Source excerpt
On a reading of the Contract as a whole the warranty expressly limited recovery to the defendant's labour and materials necessary to perform warranty work and explicitly excluded all consequential and out‑of‑pocket expenses; therefore the plaintiff cannot recover the consequential expenses and the defendant is not liable in contract; damages could not be determined on the evidence, and severance of liability for summary determination was appropriate but unnecessary given the exclusion clause.
Source excerpt
The court voided a towing company’s sale of an impounded RV for non-compliance with the Warehouse Lien Act and granted interim possession to the owner, subject to security.
The court dismissed Donna Molby’s summary trial application in a constructive dismissal case, finding the key issues were too fact-intensive and credibility-driven for Rule 9-7.
Court determined post-judgment costs after a summary trial on an easement dispute, rejected the effect of a formal offer, and awarded plaintiffs $5,600 in lump sum costs.
The court dismissed Dentalcorp’s summary trial application in a commercial lease dispute, finding the issues too fact-intensive, credibility-driven, and intertwined for summary resolution.
The court dismissed a summary trial application over a building scheme, finding the record too undeveloped to decide broad injunctions and tenancy issues.
Summary trial in a flooring supply dispute: the court held Friesen owed CanTrust on Miramar, while CanTrust owed Friesen on One Water and garnishment interest, leaving a net judgment for CanTrust.
Appeal dismissed. The Court held the policy’s subsidence exclusion unambiguously barred coverage, and the extended water damage endorsement did not apply.
Explore more
