R. v. Pringle
The Supreme Court held that a s. 83(1) firearm conviction required a distinct underlying indictable offence conviction, and dismissed the Crown’s appeal.
- Use of firearm during indictable offence (s.83)
- Kienapple principle (multiple convictions)
- Remittal to trial judge (s.623)
- Duplicitous counts and charging requirements
- Consecutive sentencing (s.83(2))
- Firearms-offences