LH Global Group (UK) Limited v Ryan Henderson & Ors

LH Global Group (UK) Limited v Ryan Henderson & Ors

Defendants failed to comply with extended disclosure obligations as ordered; no adequate explanation or proper searches were provided. Relief from sanctions was refused due to seriousness and significance of breach, and judgment was entered against all defendants for damages to be assessed.

Parties
Claimant: LH Global Group (UK) Limited; First Defendant: Ryan Henderson; Second Defendant: Travel Scholars Limited; Third Defendant: Blue Poppy Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Applications for Relief From Sanctions and Entry of Judgment
Outcome
Judgment entered against all three defendants for damages to be assessed; relief from sanctions refused.
Legal Topics
Disclosure Obligations, Relief From Sanctions, Strike Out of Defence, Judgment in Default, Fiduciary Duty, Conspiracy, Accessory Liability
Civil Procedure Company Law Disclosure Obligations Relief From Sanctions Strike Out of Defence Judgment in Default Fiduciary Duty Conspiracy +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LH Global Group (UK) Limited

Claimant

Ryan Henderson

First Defendant

Travel Scholars Limited

Second Defendant

Blue Poppy Limited

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Applications for Relief From Sanctions and Entry of Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether defendants complied with extended disclosure obligations
  2. 2 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted for non-compliance
  3. 3 Whether judgment should be entered against defendants for failure to comply with disclosure orders

Ratio Decidendi

Defendants failed to comply with extended disclosure obligations as ordered; no adequate explanation or proper searches were provided. Relief from sanctions was refused due to seriousness and significance of breach, and judgment was entered against all defendants for damages to be assessed.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered against all three defendants for damages to be assessed; relief from sanctions refused.

Orders

  • Judgment against all defendants for damages to be assessed
  • Defences struck out for non-compliance with disclosure order