Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal Criminal Division dismissed Marcus Pottinger’s appeal against conviction for section 18 wounding, holding the verdict was safe on the evidence and directions.
Pottinger, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 416 (11 March 2026)
The Court of Appeal upheld Marcus Pottinger’s conviction for section 18 wounding with intent, finding the verdict safe on the evidence and jury directions.
Ness v Miller [2026] EWHC 113 (KB) (27 January 2026)
The High Court struck out a false imprisonment claim and a data protection claim against the defendant, and refused amendments to add new defendants and a conspiracy claim.
Defendants failed to comply with extended disclosure obligations as ordered; no adequate explanation or proper searches were provided. Relief from sanctions was refused due to seriousness and significance of breach, and judgment was entered against all defendants for damages to be assessed.
Source excerpt
LH Global Group (UK) Ltd v Henderson & Ors [2025] EWHC 2832 (Ch) (18 August 2025)
The High Court refused all defendants relief from sanctions for failing to comply with disclosure orders and entered judgment for the claimant to damages to be assessed.
UW breached fiduciary duty by failing to obtain Tooling's fully informed consent to commission arrangements, but Engie is not liable as an accessory absent a pleaded and proven case of dishonesty; accessory liability for procuring breach of fiduciary duty requires dishonesty, which was not alleged or established; claim for money had and received does not lie against Engie in partial disclosure cases.
Source excerpt
Expert Tooling And Automation Ltd v Engie Power Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 292 (21 March 2025)
Court of Appeal held Tooling’s agent breached fiduciary duty by failing to fully disclose commission details, but Engie’s accessory liability required dishonesty and was not established.
The High Court discharged a worldwide freezing injunction and access/imaging order after finding serious failures in fair presentation, including misstated quantum and weak support for Phase 2 claims.
J&J Snack Foods Corporation & Anor v Ralph Peters & Sons Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 436 (Ch) (27 February 2025)
The High Court discharged a worldwide freezing injunction and access order after finding serious failures in fair presentation, especially on Phase 2 and quantum.
Future Sound Asia Sdn Bhd v The 1975 Productions LLP & Ors [2025] EWHC 384 (Ch) (24 February 2025)
The High Court struck out claims against individual band members over conduct at the Good Vibes Festival, finding no duty of care, no inducement claim, and no exemplary damages.
Explore more
