A Roy v CMR Surgical Ltd

A Roy v CMR Surgical Ltd

The Tribunal found it necessary in the interests of justice to reconsider and correct the Conley Judgment, clarified which complaints succeeded, amended clerical errors, and removed reasoning relating to compensation based on claimant's conduct as the hearing was for liability only.

Parties
Claimant: Mr A Roy; Respondent: CMR Surgical Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 February 2026
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Application for Reconsideration of Judgment
Outcome
Judgment reconsidered and varied; clerical mistakes corrected; certain complaints upheld; others dismissed; matter listed for remedy hearing.
Legal Topics
Harassment, Direct Discrimination, Reconsideration Procedure, Clerical Mistake Correction
Employment Law Equality Law Harassment Direct Discrimination Reconsideration Procedure Clerical Mistake Correction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr A Roy

Claimant

CMR Surgical Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Application for Reconsideration of Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Conley Judgment contained clerical mistakes or omissions
  2. 2 Whether reconsideration of the judgment is necessary in the interests of justice
  3. 3 Whether complaints of harassment and direct discrimination because of race are well-founded

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found it necessary in the interests of justice to reconsider and correct the Conley Judgment, clarified which complaints succeeded, amended clerical errors, and removed reasoning relating to compensation based on claimant's conduct as the hearing was for liability only.

Court Disposition

Judgment reconsidered and varied; clerical mistakes corrected; certain complaints upheld; others dismissed; matter listed for remedy hearing.

Orders

  • Date judgment sent to parties corrected to 26 February 2025
  • Reference to 'issue xl' amended to 'issue B5(xl) in Employment Judge S Moore’s list of issues'