Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tribunal found it necessary in the interests of justice to reconsider and correct the Conley Judgment, clarified which complaints succeeded, amended clerical errors, and removed reasoning relating to compensation based on claimant's conduct as the hearing was for liability only.
Source excerpt
O'Meally, Application for Reconsideration by, [2025] PBRA 288 (29 December 2025)
The Parole Board dismissed O'Meally’s reconsideration application because the challenge concerned a decision not to recommend open conditions, which was not eligible under Rule 28.
Carr, Application for Reconsideration [2025] PBRA 98 (13 May 2025)
The Parole Board refused Carr’s application for reconsideration, finding no irrationality in the panel’s decision not to direct release after an oral hearing.
Clay, Application for reconsideration, by [2024] PBRA 248 (16 December 2024)
The Parole Board refused Clay’s reconsideration application, holding that the decision not to terminate his IPP licence was not irrational.
Large, Application for Reconsideration by [2024] PBRA 26 (25 January 2024)
The Parole Board refused Large’s reconsideration application, holding that the decision not to direct early release was rational given his risk, lack of programme completion, and poor insight.
Smith, Application for Reconsideration [2023] PBRA 199 (15 November 2023)
The Parole Board refused Smith’s reconsideration application, holding that the panel’s refusal to direct release was not irrational and was procedurally fair.
The EAT held that the tribunal wrongly reconsidered its earlier judgment and set aside the reconsideration decision, restoring the original dismissal of the claims.
An EAT appeal against refusal to reconsider an age discrimination judgment was allowed because the claimant had not had a fair chance to address a parity point.
Russell, Application for Reconsideration by [2020] PBRA 9 (9 January 2020)
The Parole Board refused Russell’s application to reconsider a refusal to direct his release on licence, finding no irrationality or procedural unfairness.
Shah, Application for Reconsideration by [2019] PBRA 65 (21 November 2019)
The Parole Board refused Shah’s reconsideration application, holding that Rule 28(1) does not cover a refusal to recommend open conditions and that no good reason justified an extension or transcript.
Explore more
