Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Acer Incorporated & Anor v Nokia Technologies OY [2026] EWCA Civ 604 (18 May 2026)
The Court of Appeal held that Nokia’s disputed cross-licence term was not RAND-compliant and the case management stay was conditional on its removal.
The Court of Appeal held that Nokia’s disputed licence term was not RAND and ordered the case management stay only if that term was removed.
The High Court rejected a claim to 50% of shares in Hermes House NW2 Limited, finding no binding agreement at the 25 June 2021 meeting.
RTM v Bonne Terre Ltd & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 488 (21 April 2026)
The Court of Appeal held that consent under GDPR and PECR is an objective concept and that the High Court erred by treating the claimant’s gambling vulnerability as vitiating consent.
The High Court held the ETS binding, found GI repudiated it, awarded damages for non-issuance of equity, and rejected the counterclaims.
Rich v JDDR Capital Ltd [2026] EWHC 853 (Ch) (14 April 2026)
The High Court rejected challenges to a statutory demand and bankruptcy petition based on an alleged understanding to convert a loan into shares and related estoppel arguments.
The High Court held that the IPA held IP bond claim rights on trust for insolvency estates and that section 234 could require transfer of those rights.
Foxley v Ministry of Defence & Ors (Re Adjournment) [2026] EWHC 672 (KB) (19 March 2026)
The High Court adjourned summary judgment and jurisdiction applications after hearing PII and confidentiality issues first, finding insufficient time and needing a realistic listing.
C & J Clark International Ltd v Trek Bicycle Corporation & Anor [2026] EWHC 659 (Ch) (19 March 2026)
The High Court construed a 2001 TREK co-existence agreement, finding Trek breached it by selling TREK cycling footwear and Clarks breached it by selling TREK sports/fitness shoes.
The High Court held that Trek breached a trade mark co-existence agreement by selling TREK cycling shoes and insoles, and that Clarks also breached related restrictions.
Explore more
