Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The tribunal found that the appellant met the definition of a relevant undertaking based on employee numbers at the relevant time, that the Environment Agency followed proper procedures and issued the enforcement notice reasonably and lawfully, and that the notice was not based on an error of fact or law.
Source excerpt
Damages are an adequate remedy for the claimant given the modest financial significance of the contract and lack of cogent evidence of irremediable reputational harm. The defendant cannot be adequately compensated in damages for delay in implementation and loss of benefits from the new contract. The balance of convenience and public interest favour lifting the suspension. There is no justification for an expedited trial or hearing of a preliminary issue.
Source excerpt
Mak Systems Group Ltd v Velindre University NHS Trust [2026] EWHC 8 (TCC) (02 January 2026)
The court lifted the automatic procurement suspension and refused expedition, finding damages adequate for MAK and delay harmful to the Trust.
The tribunal dismissed Fosters Fruit n Veg Limited’s challenge to a £400 pensions fixed penalty notice for late filing of its Declaration of Compliance.
The tribunal dismissed an appeal against a £400 pensions fixed penalty notice for failing to file a re-declaration of compliance on time.
The tribunal dismissed an appeal against an escalating penalty notice, finding statutory service proved, no reasonable excuse shown, and the £2,000 penalty confirmed.
The tribunal dismissed City Logistics NW Limited’s challenge to a fixed penalty notice, finding the notice was served and no reasonable excuse for non-compliance was shown.
Route Estates breached statutory requirements by failing to publish fees inclusive of VAT and correct CMPS membership information on their website and Zoopla; Enfield Council lawfully issued MPN3000CRA, the penalty amount was reasonable, and no statutory or factual error was established by the appellant.
Source excerpt
The Tribunal dismissed Sharp Minds Communications Ltd’s appeal against a £400 fixed penalty notice, holding that service of the compliance notice was proved and no reasonable excuse was shown.
The appellant failed to rebut the statutory presumption of service and did not provide a reasonable excuse for non-compliance with employer duties. Late compliance does not justify revoking the penalty.
Source excerpt
Explore more
