Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court quashed a magistrates’ court conviction made in the claimant’s absence, finding the trial proceeded unfairly while related judicial review proceedings remained live.
Sawbridge, R (On the Application Of) v Leeds District Magistrates Court [2026] EWHC 1010 (Admin) (01 May 2026)
The High Court quashed a magistrates’ court conviction and sentence after finding it unlawfully proceeded in the claimant’s absence amid unresolved judicial review proceedings.
Walker, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Bromley [2026] EWHC 382 (Admin) (23 February 2026)
Judicial review of Bromley’s homelessness handling was dismissed as academic, with the court holding that suitability issues should be pursued under the statutory review and appeal scheme.
Permission for judicial review is refused because the matters raised are properly for the Family Court, alternative remedies exist, and there is no arguable case of disproportionate interference with Article 8 rights.
Source excerpt
Font v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2025] EWHC 3057 (Admin) (19 November 2025)
Permission for judicial review was refused in a challenge to HMRC’s MAP correspondence on UK-Spain treaty residence under a double taxation agreement.
The High Court refused permission for judicial review of HMRC’s MAP letter on UK-Spain treaty residence, holding it was an intermediate step with no legal effect.
The High Court refused renewed permission for judicial review over the claimant’s exclusion from a student union AGM, finding the claim academic and better suited to the County Court.
BGE & Anor, R (on the application of) v Birmingham Children's Trust [2025] EWHC 3451 (Admin) (22 October 2025)
Permission for judicial review was refused in a children-in-care dispute. The court held the Family Court, not judicial review, was the proper forum.
Ammori, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 1311 (17 October 2025)
The Court of Appeal held that deproscription under the Terrorism Act 2000 is not an adequate alternative remedy to judicial review of an initial proscription order.
The Court of Appeal held that deproscription and a POAC appeal were not an adequate alternative to judicial review of Palestine Action’s proscription.
Explore more
