Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2026] EWHC 1095 (KB)

BPA v NXT

BPA v NXT [2026] EWHC 1095 (KB) (08 May 2026)

The High Court struck out some defective claims, ordered amendments and a medical report, and granted anonymity in a case alleging sexual assault and harassment.

  • Strike out applications
  • Summary judgment
  • Anonymity orders
  • Harassment
  • Sexual assault
  • Pleading requirements
Read case analysis
Tort

BPA v NXT

The High Court struck out parts of a sexual assault and harassment claim, ordered amended particulars and a medical report, and granted anonymity to both parties.

  • Harassment
  • Sexual assault
  • Anonymity orders
  • Strike out applications
  • Summary judgment
  • Pleading requirements
Read case analysis
Human rights [2026] EWCOP 20

EF v The London Borough of Hackney & Anor

EF v The London Borough of Hackney & Anor [2026] EWCOP 20 (T3) (05 May 2026)

Appeal dismissed against refusal to discharge a Court of Protection Transparency Order preserving anonymity and reporting restrictions in P’s welfare proceedings.

  • Transparency order
  • Reporting restrictions
  • Article 8 echr
  • Article 10 echr
  • Proportionality
  • Freedom of expression
Read case analysis
Human rights

EF v The London Borough of Hackney & Anor

Appeal dismissed against refusal to discharge a Court of Protection Transparency Order. The judge held the order proportionately protected P’s privacy and placement stability.

  • Transparency orders
  • Article 8 echr
  • Article 10 echr
  • Proportionality
  • Reporting restrictions
  • Anonymity orders
Read case analysis
Social security law

LM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor

The Upper Tribunal allowed the appeal in a child support case, set aside the First-tier Tribunal’s decision for legal error, and remitted the matter for a fresh hearing.

  • Child support
  • Shared care
  • Tribunal procedure
  • Anonymity orders
  • Child-support
  • Shared-care
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Emilia Idziak v Merlin Entertainment PLC & Anor

The County Court refused the claimant’s late application for anonymity, holding that open justice prevailed and the evidence did not justify restricting publication.

  • Anonymity orders
  • Open justice
  • Balancing of article 8 and article 10 rights
  • Reporting restrictions
  • Anonymity-orders
  • Open-justice
Read case analysis
Data protection [2026] EWHC 1022 (KB)

Secake & Ors v Shared Services Connected Ltd (Rev1)

Secake & Ors v Shared Services Connected Ltd (Rev1) [2026] EWHC 1022 (KB) (30 April 2026)

The High Court refused a class-based anonymity order in a 2,502-claimant data breach claim, finding the evidence too general and speculative to displace open justice.

  • Anonymity orders
  • Open justice
  • Gdpr
  • Data breach
  • Civil litigation procedure
  • Anonymity-orders
Read case analysis
Data protection

Lepani Secake & Ors v Shared Services Connected Ltd

The High Court refused a 2,502-claimant application for anonymity in a data breach claim, holding the evidence was too general to justify departing from open justice.

  • Anonymity orders
  • Open justice
  • Gdpr
  • Data breach
  • Civil litigation procedure
  • Anonymity-orders
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] EWCC 24

Idziak v Merlin Entertainment PLC & Anor

Idziak v Merlin Entertainment PLC & Anor [2026] EWCC 24 (30 April 2026)

The County Court refused the claimant’s post-trial application for anonymity, holding that open justice prevailed and the evidence did not justify derogation.

  • Anonymity orders
  • Open justice
  • Article 8 echr
  • Article 10 echr
  • Reporting restrictions
  • Anonymity-orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.