Tarnjit Singh Gill & Anor v Jagjit Kaur & Anor
The proprietary injunction is continued because the Claimants have demonstrated a serious issue to be tried regarding misappropriation of WPHL, damages would not be an adequate remedy, the balance of convenience favours the Claimants, and it is expedient to grant relief given the ongoing Delaware proceedings and absence of jurisdictional conflict.
Source excerpt
- Proprietary injunction
- Section 25 civil jurisdiction and judgments act 1982
- Derivative proceedings
- Fiduciary duties
- Asset misappropriation