Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed the claim against Mr Mandelli, holding the pleaded facts did not show he personally assumed responsibility to the Claimants.
Professional negligence claim against Womble Bond Dickinson dismissed after the court found no breach, no causation, and no realistic planning chance.
Khamba & Ors v Harrow London Borough Council & Ors [2025] EWHC 2803 (KB) (29 October 2025)
High Court strike-out and summary judgment application over a mental health assessment under the MHA 1983. The court held leave under s.139(2) was required and the claims were a nullity.
The High Court rejected claims in misfeasance in public office and negligence over the SFA’s refusal to endorse a proposed change of ownership of an apprenticeship provider.
A&O's claim that BNY owed a contractual and/or tortious duty to confirm listing of the notes, based on the S&CAs, has real prospects of success and should proceed to trial. The S&CAs may evidence an intention to create legal relations, and the context does not preclude the existence of such duties. The Indenture and Supplemental Indentures do not, as a matter of law, exclude the possibility of contractual or tortious duties arising from the S&CAs. Summary judgment is therefore refused on A&O's contribution claim.
Source excerpt
Future Sound Asia Sdn Bhd v The 1975 Productions LLP & Ors [2025] EWHC 384 (Ch) (24 February 2025)
The High Court struck out claims against individual band members over conduct at the Good Vibes Festival, finding no duty of care, no inducement claim, and no exemplary damages.
The High Court struck out claims against The 1975’s individual band members, finding no personal duty of care, no inducement claim, and no viable common design liability.
The police did not owe a duty of care to Mr Dobson after his release from custody because they no longer exercised control over him, there was no statutory or factual basis to detain him further, and the pre-release risk assessment and mental health assessment were adequate. There was no breach of duty and no causative link between the police's actions and Mr Dobson's subsequent self-harm.
Source excerpt
Dobson v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police [2025] EWHC 272 (KB) (07 February 2025)
The High Court dismissed a negligence claim arising from Mr Dobson’s release from police custody, holding the police owed no continuing post-release duty.
The Court of Appeal held that police owed no negligence duty to warn or protect these claimants from third-party harm, and that Article 3 was not engaged until contact offending was reported.
Explore more
