Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
CTSL must pay TfL's costs of the application to lift the automatic suspension and the expedited trial application, subject to detailed assessment. TfL is entitled to a payment on account of £720,866.85. Indra's application for costs is reserved to the trial judge as its entitlement is not established at this stage.
Source excerpt
The High Court refused to lift the automatic suspension in a procurement challenge over NHS car park management services, finding the statutory balance favoured keeping it in place.
Damages are an adequate remedy for the claimant given the modest financial significance of the contract and lack of cogent evidence of irremediable reputational harm. The defendant cannot be adequately compensated in damages for delay in implementation and loss of benefits from the new contract. The balance of convenience and public interest favour lifting the suspension. There is no justification for an expedited trial or hearing of a preliminary issue.
Source excerpt
Parkingeye Ltd v Velindre University NHS Trust & Anor [2026] EWHC 1019 (TCC) (01 May 2026)
The High Court refused to lift an automatic suspension under the Procurement Act 2023 in a car park management procurement challenge, finding the public interest favoured keeping it in place.
The High Court lifted the automatic suspension in a procurement challenge over Home Office migration services and refused an expedited trial.
Cubic Transportation Systems Ltd v Transport for London & Anor [2026] EWHC 211 (TCC) (05 February 2026)
The TCC ordered Cubic to pay TfL’s costs of an automatic suspension challenge and £720,866.85 on account, while reserving Indra’s costs to trial.
Cubic Transportation Systems Ltd v Transport for London & Anor [2026] EWHC 61 (TCC) (15 January 2026)
The High Court lifted the automatic suspension in a procurement challenge over TfL’s Proteus Contract, finding damages adequate for CTSL and the balance of convenience in TfL’s favour.
The High Court lifted the automatic suspension in a procurement challenge over TfL’s Proteus Contract, finding damages would be adequate for CTSL and delay would harm TfL.
Mak Systems Group Ltd v Velindre University NHS Trust [2026] EWHC 8 (TCC) (02 January 2026)
The court lifted the automatic procurement suspension and refused expedition, finding damages adequate for MAK and delay harmful to the Trust.
The court ordered the Defence amended to remove a no-damages argument, and held the Defendant was entitled to costs on the automatic suspension and expedition applications.
Explore more
