Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual property

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. & Anor v Alvotech HF & Anor

The High Court held that an SPC export-waiver notification can be valid before an export-country marketing authorisation is granted, so long as the MA number is supplied once publicly available.

  • Supplementary protection certificate (spc)
  • Spc manufacturing waiver
  • Patent infringement
  • Biosimilars
  • Notification requirements
  • Supplementary-protection-certificates
Read case analysis
Intellectual property [2025] EWHC 2527 (Pat)

Formycon AG & Anor v Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc & Anor

Formycon AG & Anor v Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc & Anor [2025] EWHC 2527 (Pat) (08 October 2025)

Patents Court trial on aflibercept formulation patents, addressing infringement by equivalence, priority, added matter, obviousness and insufficiency.

  • Patent infringement by equivalence
  • Patent validity
  • Obviousness
  • Sufficiency
  • Added matter
  • Priority entitlement
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Formycon AG & Anor v Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. & Anor

Patent trial on aflibercept formulations: the court rejected infringement by equivalence, upheld the ‘691 patent as amended, and invalidated ‘306 for added matter.

  • Patent infringement by equivalence
  • Obviousness
  • Added matter
  • Priority entitlement
  • Sufficiency
  • Formulation patents
Read case analysis
Intellectual property law

Samsung Bioepis UK Limited v Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Samsung demonstrated an objective need for expedition due to the ongoing commercial uncertainty and chilling effect caused by Alexion's assertion of patent rights, which may inhibit uptake of Samsung's biosimilar. The court found this justified some degree of expedition, balanced against the court's calendar and parties' availability, and ordered the trial expedited to a date no earlier than mid-February 2025.

  • Expedition of proceedings
  • Patent infringement
  • Patent revocation
  • Biosimilars
  • Interim injunctions
Read case analysis
Intellectual property [2024] EWHC 2567 (Pat)

Sandoz AG & Ors v Biogen MA Inc

Sandoz AG & Ors v Biogen MA Inc [2024] EWHC 2567 (Pat) (11 October 2024)

High Court patent trial on a JCV antibody assay for PML risk assessment, addressing validity, infringement, claim construction, and Arrow-type relief.

  • Patent validity
  • Patent infringement
  • Biosimilars
  • Declaratory relief
  • Insufficiency
  • Inventive step
Read case analysis
Intellectual property [2024] EWHC 1407 (Pat)

Samsung Bioepis UK Ltd v Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Samsung Bioepis UK Ltd v Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc [2024] EWHC 1407 (Pat) (06 June 2024)

The Patents Court granted Samsung’s application to expedite a patent trial, finding objectively ascertainable commercial urgency from a likely chilling effect on biosimilar uptake.

  • Expedition of trial
  • Patent infringement
  • Patent revocation
  • Biosimilars
  • Commercial certainty
  • Patent-expedition
Read case analysis
Intellectual property

Pfizer Ltd v F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG & Anor

The Patents Court refused Pfizer’s request for Arrow declarations about bevacizumab combinations, holding that no UK patent rights remained and foreign spin-off value was insufficient.

  • Arrow declarations
  • Gillette defence
  • Biosimilars
  • Supplementary protection certificates
  • Patent prosecution
  • Jurisdiction of declarations
Read case analysis
Intellectual property [2019] EWHC 1520 (Pat)

Pfizer Ltd v F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG & Anor

Pfizer Ltd v F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG & Anor [2019] EWHC 1520 (Pat) (20 June 2019)

The Patents Court refused Pfizer’s request for Arrow declarations over bevacizumab patent families, holding the declarations would not serve a sufficient useful purpose.

  • Arrow declarations
  • Biosimilars
  • Patent thickets
  • Declaratory relief
  • Obviousness
  • Novelty
Read case analysis
Intellectual property [2016] EWHC 3383 (Ch)

Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co, Ltd & Ors v Abbvie Biotechnology Ltd & Anor

Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co, Ltd & Ors v Abbvie Biotechnology Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 3383 (Ch) (29 December 2016)

The High Court refused AbbVie’s bid to stop patent-clearing Arrow declaration claims over adalimumab, finding a real prospect that declarations would serve a useful purpose.

  • Arrow declarations
  • Summary judgment
  • Abuse of process
  • Declaratory relief
  • Gillette defence
  • Divisionals and patent strategy
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.