Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Protection granted Alison Parr personal welfare deputyship for her adult daughter Ruby and varied reporting restrictions to permit naming the family.
Bristol City Council v CC & Ors [2026] EWCOP 19 (T3) (30 April 2026)
The Court of Protection made final declarations on CC’s capacity, held his care arrangements amount to a deprivation of liberty, and authorised ongoing best-interests care plans.
The Court of Protection made capacity declarations for CC, authorised his current care arrangements as a deprivation of liberty, and continued a transparency order.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed SPS Logistics Limited’s appeal against refusal of an operator’s licence, holding the site was unsuitable due to oversubscription.
SJ lacks capacity to conduct proceedings, manage diabetes, and make decisions about care and support due to schizophrenia-related delusional beliefs and avolition. She has capacity to decide where to live only between options assessed as meeting her needs. The risks of a trial at home are unacceptably high and cannot be mitigated; continued residence at Z Placement with current care is in her best interests. Deprivation of liberty is necessary, proportionate, and authorised.
Source excerpt
The court found that artificial feeding, IV fluids, and blood tests would provide minimal benefit and intolerable burdens for AS, whose condition is irreversible and whose life expectancy is short. AS previously declined NG tube insertion. The unanimous clinical evidence supports a palliative care approach, which is in AS's best interests.
Source excerpt
PX lacks capacity to conduct proceedings and make decisions regarding residence and contact due to her learning disability. There is an immediate risk of emotional harm in MX's care, and insufficient evidence of risk in FX's care or at C1. It is in PX's best interests to return immediately to C1 and for contact with MX to be supervised pending a full hearing.
Source excerpt
PX lacks capacity to make relevant decisions; MX's contact must be supervised due to risk of emotional harm; PX should reside with FX during holidays; no restrictions on FX's contact; DOLs and permission requirement orders are justified to protect PX's welfare.
Source excerpt
PX lacks capacity to conduct proceedings and make decisions regarding residence and contact. MX poses a risk of emotional and potentially physical harm to PX if contact is unsupervised. It is in PX's best interests to reside with FX during holidays and for MX's contact to be supervised by a professional or, where not possible, limited to video calls.
Source excerpt
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust v AS & Anor [2026] EWCOP 15 (T3) (24 March 2026)
The Court of Protection authorised a palliative care plan for an 83-year-old stroke patient, declining further NG or PEG feeding, IV fluids, potassium, and blood tests.
Explore more
