Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed a sanctions review challenge to the family-association designation criterion and the claimant’s maintained designation under the Russia Regulations.
Ismailov (No 2) V Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs [2026] EWHC 1188 (Admin) (18 May 2026)
Challenge to UK sanctions designating Sarvar Ismailov as an immediate family member of Alisher Usmanov dismissed; the family criterion and maintenance decision were upheld.
The Supreme Court held that an interim custody order under the 1972 Order required the Secretary of State’s personal consideration, so the appellant’s convictions were quashed.
The Upper Tribunal held that an A4e adviser was not an officer of the DWP, so wrong advice could not trigger late-claim backdating under regulation 19(5)(d).
Forsey, R (on the application of) v The Northern Derbyshire Magistrates' Court [2017] EWHC 1152 (QB) (19 May 2017)
The High Court held that s.194(2) of the 1992 Act does not exclude the Carltona principle, so a qualified departmental official could lawfully institute proceedings.
The Divisional Court held that section 194(2) of the 1992 Act did not exclude the Carltona principle, so a departmental lawyer could lawfully institute the prosecution.
Forsey, R (on the application of) v The Northern Derbyshire Magistrates' Court [2017] EWHC 1152 (QB) (19 May 2017)
The Divisional Court held that s.194(2) of the 1992 Act did not exclude the Carltona principle, so a departmental lawyer could lawfully institute the prosecution.
The UK Supreme Court held that prolonged prison segregation was unlawful because the required authorisation was not given by the Secretary of State. It also clarified the fair-process requirements.
The Court of Appeal held that a deportation order was lawfully made when signed by an authorised official, and that reasons could be given afterwards with the notice.
JG (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 410 (29 April 2015)
The Court of Appeal held that a deportation order was lawfully made when signed by a senior official, and that reasons could validly follow in a later notice.
Explore more
