Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law

M v F (Fact Finding Hearing)

The court found the mother's allegations of sexual coercion, conditional consent rape, physical abuse, and controlling/coercive behaviour to be false, preferring the father's evidence and finding no behaviour by the father justifying continuation of any restrictive orders.

  • Domestic abuse
  • Fact finding
  • Non-molestation orders
  • Prohibited steps orders
  • Specific issue orders
  • Child contact
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] EWHC 1209 (Fam)

L v P

L v P [2026] EWHC 1209 (Fam) (07 May 2026)

The High Court refused to set aside a 3-year Civil Restraint Order against a father after repeated meritless applications in child-contact litigation.

  • Civil restraint orders
  • Section 91(14) orders
  • Permission to appeal
  • Child contact
  • Civil-restraint-orders
  • Section-91-14-orders
Read case analysis
Family law

A Child born 2017 – Final Hearing, Re

The father's failure to address or provide evidence regarding his domestic abuse and substance misuse, his lack of insight, and his non-compliance with court orders present ongoing risks to the child. The welfare of the child requires that no direct or indirect contact (other than limited provision of photographs) be ordered, and that a section 91(14) order be made to restrict further applications for five years.

  • Child contact
  • Domestic abuse
  • Substance misuse
  • Section 91(14) children act
  • Welfare checklist
  • Parental responsibility
Read case analysis
Family law

CF v CM

Given the identified risks—CF's unresolved pornography addiction and impulsivity, the risk of X developing false beliefs about past abuse, delay in re-establishing the father-child relationship, and CM's entrenched beliefs—the court determined that direct contact should not be ordered until all parties have completed recommended therapeutic interventions and their success is evidenced. Indirect contact is to continue, and a specific issue order is made for X to engage in therapy. The proceedings are concluded to avoid further delay, with the possibility of review after therapy completion.

  • Child contact
  • Welfare principle
  • Therapeutic intervention
  • Parental responsibility
  • Delay in proceedings
Read case analysis
Family law

H v O (Fact-Finding)

The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that H engaged in a pattern of domestic abuse against O, including physical violence, sexual assault (rape), controlling and humiliating behaviour, and threats. The court preferred O's evidence as more credible and consistent, corroborated by contemporaneous records and third-party statements. The court did not find the allegations of violence against the children proved but found the father's conduct towards O established a grave risk of harm and justified the findings sought.

  • Domestic abuse
  • Child contact
  • Hague convention 1980
  • Fact-finding
  • Asylum and immigration
  • Fgm allegations
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] EWFC 77 (B)

D v E (Welfare Decision following Findings of Domestic Abuse)

D v E (Welfare Decision following Findings of Domestic Abuse) [2026] EWFC 77 (B) (24 March 2026)

Following findings of domestic abuse, the court stopped all direct contact between a child and her father, continued a medical-information PSO, made a s91(14) order, and allowed anonymised publication.

  • Domestic abuse
  • Child contact
  • Prohibited steps order
  • Section 91(14) orders
  • Welfare checklist
  • Parental involvement presumption
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] EWFC 55 (B)

A Child Born 2017, Re (Final Hearing)

A Child Born 2017, Re (Final Hearing) [2026] EWFC 55 (B) (27 February 2026)

The court refused direct child contact, allowed only photo-sharing, and made a five-year section 91(14) order after finding ongoing risks from domestic abuse and substance misuse.

  • Child contact
  • Domestic abuse
  • Substance misuse
  • Section 91(14) children act 1989
  • Welfare checklist
  • Parental responsibility
Read case analysis
Family law

F v M & Ors

The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the father did not sexually assault or coerce the mother, nor act in a controlling manner. The mother was not a victim of coercive control. The court found that A was not sexually abused by a third-party while in the father's care, and the father was innocent of all related allegations. The court found that the mother emotionally manipulated the children, asked A leading questions to obtain evidence of sexual abuse, encouraged and influenced A to make false allegations, and suspended contact based on false allegations. The mother admitted…

  • Child contact
  • Domestic abuse
  • Coercive control
  • False allegations
  • Fact-finding hearings
Read case analysis
Family law

FM v MK

Contact between FM and the children would cause significant emotional, psychological, and physical harm to the mother and children, with no mechanism to reduce those risks due to FM's lack of insight and ongoing abusive behaviour. Revocation of FM's parental responsibility, a section 91(14) order, and a non-molestation order are necessary and proportionate to safeguard the welfare of the children and the mother.

  • Domestic abuse
  • Parental responsibility
  • Child contact
  • Non-molestation orders
  • Section 91(14) orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.