Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Baltimore Wharf SLP v Ballymore Properties Ltd [2026] EWHC 312 (TCC) (16 February 2026)
The High Court held that a claimed settlement remained subject to contract and was not binding, so summary judgment and strike-out were refused.
The High Court held that no binding settlement was concluded because the “subject to contract” reservation had not been expressly or impliedly removed.
The High Court struck out the defendant’s defence and awarded One Hyde Park damages for defective pipework, valves, soldered joints, and a faulty pantograph cradle.
One Hyde Park Ltd v Laing O'Rourke Construction South Ltd [2026] EWHC 155 (TCC) (02 February 2026)
The High Court struck out the defence and found the defendant liable for major defects at One Hyde Park, awarding damages for pipework, valves, soldered joints and a cradle.
Toppan Holdings Ltd & Anor v Augusta 2008 LLP [2025] EWHC 1691 (TCC) (04 July 2025)
The TCC held the defendant liable for fire-safety and construction defects at a care home, awarding damages for lost profits, abortive costs, and interest, but rejecting some remote loss claims.
JMW Solicitors LLP & Ors v Injury Lawyers 4U Ltd & Ors [2024] EWHC 3103 (Ch) (03 December 2024)
The High Court granted summary judgment for the defendants on most claims in a shareholder dispute over a slot price differential, while allowing a possible amendment issue on appointment and transfer points.
The merger under Jersey law (Article 127G) operated to vest all property, rights, and trusteeship in the merged company (B3), so the chain of title was preserved and the Claimants have standing to sue. The Security Agreement with Wells Fargo did not constitute an absolute assignment of the relevant rights, but only a charge by way of security, so the Claimants retain the right to bring the claims. There is no impediment to the Claimants' title to sue.
Source excerpt
The 2013 Shareholders Agreement, by clear and unambiguous entire agreement and termination clauses, superseded all prior agreements including the Supplemental Deed and any Slot Price Differential obligations. No collateral warranty or estoppel by convention survived the 2013 Agreement. The Claimants' pleaded claims have no real prospect of success. Summary judgment is granted unless Claimants apply to amend their pleadings within 14 days to advance new arguments regarding the validity of the share transfer and director appointments.
Source excerpt
Litasco SA v Der Mond Oil and Gas Africa SA & Anor (Rev1) [2023] EWHC 2866 (Comm) (15 November 2023)
The High Court granted summary judgment for Litasco on unpaid sums under an addendum, rejecting defences based on misrepresentation, force majeure, sanctions, and frustration.
The court ordered Evolve Housing + Support to provide further information in a construction and fire-safety defect claim, holding STL was entitled to know the pleaded case.
Explore more
