Sign in
England and Wales Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

England and Wales Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

England and Wales decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Admiralty [2024] EWHC 2106 (Admlty)

The Owners of the "Christos Theo" v The Owners of the "Aliki"

The Owners of the "Christos Theo" v The Owners of the "Aliki" [2024] EWHC 2106 (Admlty) (06 June 2024)

In an admiralty collision claim, the court ordered extensive specific disclosure, approved the expert question on engine malfunction, and refused further information.

  • Disclosure
  • Expert evidence
  • Further information
  • Engine malfunction
  • Collision liability
  • Specific-disclosure
Read case analysis
Admiralty

The Owners of the "Christos Theo" v The Owners of the "Aliki"

The defendants demonstrated a prima facie case of engine malfunction and incomplete disclosure by the claimants. The documents sought are relevant to the core issues and must be disclosed or a disclosure statement provided. The expert issue should be framed as proposed by the defendants. The claimants' application for further information is refused as unnecessary and argumentative.

  • Specific disclosure
  • Expert evidence
  • Further information
  • Marine engine malfunction
  • Collision liability
Read case analysis
Admiralty [2022] EWHC 2828 (Admlty)

MV Pacific Pearl Co Ltd v Quick Ship Holdings SA

MV Pacific Pearl Co Ltd v Quick Ship Holdings SA [2022] EWHC 2828 (Admlty) (11 November 2022)

The High Court held that Alexander, Falcon and Orpheus were all at fault for the Suez Canal collision, and apportioned liability 5:5:2.

  • Collision liability
  • Apportionment of fault
  • Good seamanship
  • Collision regulations
  • Suez canal authority rules
  • Contribution between ships
Read case analysis
Maritime law [2021] EWHC 2652 (Admlty)

River Countess BV & Ors v MSC Cruise Management (UK) Ltd

River Countess BV & Ors v MSC Cruise Management (UK) Ltd [2021] EWHC 2652 (Admlty) (04 October 2021)

Preliminary issue on Italian law after a Venice cruise ship collision. The court held the third claimant's lost net revenue claim was recoverable in principle, subject to proof of irreplaceability.

  • Collision liability
  • Economic loss
  • Title to sue
  • Measure of damages
  • Foreign law application
  • Maritime-collision
Read case analysis
Admiralty [2018] EWHC 389 (Admlty)

Al Khattiya, The Owners of the Ship v Owners and/or Demise Charterers of the Ship "Jag Laadki"

Al Khattiya, The Owners of the Ship v Owners and/or Demise Charterers of the Ship "Jag Laadki" [2018] EWHC 389 (Admlty) (01 March 2018)

The Admiralty Court refused a forum non conveniens stay and upheld an antisuit injunction in a collision claim where liability was admitted and only quantum remained.

  • Forum non conveniens
  • Antisuit injunctions
  • Jurisdiction in rem
  • Limitation of liability (maritime)
  • Collision liability
  • Choice of law
Read case analysis
Maritime law

Miom 1 Ltd & Anor v Sea Echo ENE

The Admiralty Court apportioned collision liability equally between SEA EXPRESS 1 and ALASKA RAINBOW after finding serious faults in navigation and lookout on both vessels.

  • Collision liability
  • Bridge management
  • Radar lookout
  • Apportionment of fault
  • Collision-liability
  • Bridge-management
Read case analysis
Admiralty [2001] EWHC 528 (Admlty)

Seafarer 1, The Owners of the Ship v The Owners of the Ship "Fedra"

Seafarer 1, The Owners of the Ship v The Owners of the Ship "Fedra" [2001] EWHC 528 (Admlty) (12 December 2001)

Admiralty collision case on whether post-collision flooding in the Fedra’s No 4 hold was caused by the collision or by pre-existing corrosion.

  • Causation of damage
  • Negligence
  • Constructive total loss
  • Unseaworthiness
  • Collision liability
  • Admiralty-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

England and Wales decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.