A Muda v Malaysia
The claimant's employment and claim were not sufficiently close to governmental functions to constitute an act of sovereign authority; her claim was for pay under a contract and did not engage sovereign authority. The ET's findings of fact and evaluative judgment were correct and contained no error of law.
Source excerpt
- State immunity
- Sovereign authority
- Employment contracts
- Unlawful deduction from wages
- Remedial orders
- Compatibility with echr