Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Commercial Court held that JLL’s valuation was a contractual valuation under the facilities agreement, despite criticism of the process, so the Cash Trap Event stood.
The High Court held that the covenant benefit over the Green Land had not passed to Alpha Trust, but had been transferred in relation to the Sliver.
Spec 1 Ltd & Ors v The Export-Import Bank of China [2026] EWHC 1162 (Comm) (15 May 2026)
The Commercial Court construed an asymmetric jurisdiction clause in a ship finance agreement and refused both a stay and anti-suit relief, allowing the English claim to proceed.
FH Holding Moscow Ltd v AO UniCredit Bank & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 468 (17 April 2026)
The Court of Appeal held that Moscow enforcement proceedings were not brought in breach of the Vienna arbitration clause, so the anti-suit injunction claim failed.
Mindful Contract Solutions Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWHC 1011 (Ch) (26 March 2026)
The High Court dismissed an appeal over an introduction fee clause, holding the fee was based on actual fees paid and that the invoice dispute clause did not apply.
Nawaz-Khan & Ors v UAP Ltd [2026] EWHC 641 (Comm) (18 March 2026)
Commercial dispute over a share purchase agreement. The court upheld the expert determination, construed the SPA to include disputed accounting items in price, and dismissed the counterclaim.
The TCC enforced an adjudication in part, holding the payment notice invalid but the pay less notice valid, and refusing a stay despite insolvency concerns.
Zaha Hadid Ltd v The Zaha Hadid Foundation [2026] EWCA Civ 192 (27 February 2026)
The Court of Appeal held that a trade mark licence of indefinite duration was terminable by either party on reasonable notice, and was not a restraint of trade.
Commercial Court held that Onex was not liable for an Iraqi SRFO cargo containing 16ppm organic chlorides; the contract’s “typicals” were not binding warranties.
The High Court construed a shareholders’ agreement governing a buyout option and held that the auditors had not yet been given the right issues to determine under the agreement.
Explore more
