Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Corallo & Ors v Pinelli & Ors [2025] EWHC 3211 (Ch) (08 December 2025)
The High Court dismissed a freezing order application against Mr Pinelli, finding no solid evidence of a real risk of dissipation, and accepted undertakings in lieu of injunctions.
GI Globinvestment Ltd & Ors v XY ERS UK Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 740 (Comm) (28 March 2025)
Commercial Court decision on alleged fraud, misrepresentation, duty breaches and conspiracy over structured investments and Skew Base Fund losses.
Firdous v Ecclesall Design Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 90 (TCC) (22 January 2025)
The High Court struck out claims in a construction dispute where the pleadings were vague, incoherent, and unsupported. Further amendment was refused.
Novitas Loans Ltd v AmTrust Europe Ltd [2024] EWHC 3410 (Comm) (29 November 2024)
The High Court held that disclosure issues about managerial discussions on risk assessments and eligibility criteria were relevant and should be included.
Post-trial costs judgment where the claimant failed, but the court reduced defendants’ recoverable costs for mediation-related conduct and litigation conduct.
Wales (t/a Selective Investment Services) v CBRE Managed Services Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 1050 (Comm) (30 April 2020)
Costs judgment after trial dismissal: the claimant was ordered to pay substantial costs, with reductions reflecting CBRE’s unreasonable refusal to mediate and Aviva’s late case change.
Ccunico Resources NV & Ors v Daskalakis & Anor [2019] EWHC 57 (Comm) (18 January 2019)
The High Court held that claims by Cunico group companies against former executives were employment-related under the Lugano Convention, defeating the jurisdiction clause.
Willis Ltd & Anor v Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group Plc & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 450 (22 April 2015)
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal and granted a short interim injunction to restrain alleged further employee poaching and preserve the status quo pending return date.
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal and granted a short interim injunction, holding the judge had wrongly treated the staff-poaching risk as spent.
A hot-work fire at an aggregate plant led to contract, tort, and insurance warranty claims. The court found the fire’s likely cause but dismissed liability.
Explore more
