Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
High Court administrative appeal dismissed a challenge to a council tax support decision, holding there was no error of law in the tribunal’s findings.
Kasperowicz v Plymouth City Council [2021] EWHC 1208 (Admin) (02 February 2021)
Statutory appeal challenging a council tax reduction decision was dismissed because the issues were factual, not legal, and later support made the appeal academic.
Francois v London Borough of Waltham Forest (Rev 1) [2017] EWHC 2252 (Admin) (08 August 2017)
The High Court dismissed an appeal against the refusal of council tax reduction, holding that the appellant had not provided enough information about capital held in a personal injury trust.
The High Court dismissed an appeal against a Valuation Tribunal decision refusing council tax reduction, holding the claimant had not supplied required capital information.
The High Court refused to extend time and dismissed Mr Turner’s appeal against cancellation of Council Tax Reduction for failing to provide requested information.
Turner v South Cambridgeshire District Council [2016] EWHC 1017 (Admin) (05 May 2016)
The High Court refused permission to appeal out of time and dismissed a challenge to a council tax reduction decision, holding the tribunal had not erred in law.
South Tyneside Council v Aitken [2014] EWHC 4163 (Admin) (27 November 2014)
The High Court held that Mr Aitken’s receipt of ESA meant the council tax support reduction applied, and the tribunal had erred in law.
The High Court allowed South Tyneside Council’s appeal, holding that Mr Aitken remained subject to the scheme’s standard percentage reduction in council tax support.
South Gloucestershire Council v Titley & Anor [2006] EWHC 3117 (Admin) (07 December 2006)
High Court appeal on council tax disability reductions. The court held the rooms were not “additional” or “extra” because of disability and allowed the council’s appeals.
The High Court held that rooms used in the ordinary course of living were not “additional” rooms required by disability, so the council’s appeals succeeded.
Explore more
