Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Commercial Court granted Nexedge permission to enforce a cross-undertaking in damages after a freezing injunction was discharged as wrongly obtained.
High Court decision dismissing an application to discharge or vary a freezing order. The court found no material change of circumstances and no basis for extra fortification.
The non-disclosure regarding the LIFO tracing methodology was innocent and did not cause prejudice; the court retains discretion and it would be disproportionate to discharge the injunction. The order should be continued as there is jurisdiction and no compelling reason to set it aside.
Source excerpt
Mex Group Worldwide Ltd v Ford & Ors (Rev1) [2026] EWHC 629 (KB) (17 March 2026)
The High Court ordered an inquiry as to damages on a cross-undertaking after discharging a worldwide freezing order, finding an arguable case of loss and no special reason to refuse it.
The Commercial Court refused to raise a freezing-order disclosure threshold, but increased fortification of the cross-undertaking and ordered payment into Court.
The High Court continued a freezing injunction over a disputed $9.4 million transfer, finding a good arguable case of fraud and breach of contract and a real risk of dissipation.
The High Court continued a freezing order in a dispute over TNT supply contracts, finding serious issues on fraud, conspiracy, and dissipation, and rejecting discharge arguments.
The Commercial Court allowed defendants to amend pleadings in a damages inquiry after a freezing order dispute, rejecting strike-out and permitting limited further information.
Mex Group Worldwide Ltd v Ford & Ors [2025] EWHC 2689 (KB) (17 October 2025)
The High Court dealt with contempt, a cross-undertaking in damages, and costs arising from a worldwide freezing order linked to Scottish proceedings.
The High Court declined to impose a further contempt penalty, ordered an inquiry into cross-undertaking damages, and made mixed costs orders after discontinuance.
Explore more
