Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court allowed an amendment to add a deceit claim, holding it was not arguably time-barred because loss from an unsecured guarantee arose only on demand.
The defendant made false representations about the SPV 20 loan, knowing them to be untrue, with intent to induce investment. The claimants relied on these representations and suffered loss. The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, and there is no compelling reason for trial. Summary judgment is granted.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed Segulah to amend its deceit claim, finding the proposed implied-misrepresentation case had a real prospect of success and should proceed to trial.
Segulah Medical Acceleration AB & Ors v Tripathi & Anor [2026] EWHC 1002 (Ch) (29 April 2026)
The High Court allowed Segulah to amend its claim to plead deceit based on alleged implied representations made by Mr Tripathi during an investment call.
Jinxin Inc v Auletta & Ors [2026] EWHC 765 (Comm) (31 March 2026)
Fraud and conspiracy claims arising from Jinxin’s purchase of MPS Group shares were dismissed after trial, the court finding no proved deceit or bribery.
The High Court dismissed a summary judgment application in a share sale dispute, holding the defendant had a reasonably arguable defence on warranty breach and fraud-related liability.
James & Anor v HSBC UK Bank PLC (Rev1) [2026] EWCA Civ 88 (17 February 2026)
Court of Appeal held the claimants had enough information by 2013 to plead fraud, so their proposed claims were time-barred and the appeal failed.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against strike-out, holding the claimants knew enough in 2013 to plead fraud and limitation had begun then.
The High Court struck out the claimant’s tort and fiduciary claims for lack of causation and duty, but allowed the contractual disclosure claim to proceed.
Cohen v Morrison & Ors [2026] EWHC 184 (Ch) (02 February 2026)
The High Court struck out or dismissed most of Mr Cohen’s claims over alleged concealment and share-sale misconduct, leaving only a contractual information claim.
Explore more
