Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Permission to appeal was refused in challenges to the armed forces disability-discrimination exemption under the Equality Act 2010 and Human Rights Act 1998.
L & Anor v Ministry of Defence [2026] EWCA Civ 602 (21 April 2026)
Permission to appeal was refused in challenges to the armed forces disability discrimination exclusion under the Equality Act 2010 and the HRA.
The Privy Council set aside a declaration that Cayman Islands immigration legislation was incompatible with the right to private and family life.
The Court of Appeal declared section 4(2)(a) of the State Immunity Act 1978 incompatible with Article 6 ECHR and made a pro bono costs order.
Kingdom of Spain v Lorenzo (Supplementary Judgment) [2025] EWCA Civ 59 (29 January 2025)
The Court of Appeal made a declaration that section 4(2)(a) of the State Immunity Act 1978 is incompatible with Article 6 ECHR, and ordered costs.
The Upper Tribunal held that the 2023 Remedial Order did not help claims made before 9 February 2023, so the pre-order law applied and the appeal failed.
Disclosure of the fact-finding judgment to the Father's employer (MOD) is refused because comprehensive disclosure has already been made to the police, who are bound by statutory and common law safeguarding duties and protocols with the military; there is no evidence that the Father's employment brings him into contact with vulnerable persons, and further disclosure is unnecessary and disproportionate. The court is entitled to assume that regulatory and investigatory bodies follow law and procedure. No further psychiatric expert evidence is ordered as the Mother refuses assessment; the court…
Source excerpt
The extension of the no-return period from 3 months to 12 months in sections 60C(3), 61(4ZA)(a), 62(1A)(a), and 62B(2) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 is disproportionate and unjustified, given the shortage of transit pitches and the maximum permitted stay on transit pitches. The remaining amendments, including the new criminal offence and police powers, are justified and proportionate, as they are sufficiently confined by statutory conditions and guidance and pursue a legitimate aim.
Source excerpt
The Administrative Court refused to stay leasehold reform judicial reviews challenging the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 and lifted stays on related claims.
Abacus Land 1 (HoldCo 1) Ltd & Ors v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2024] EWHC 2753 (Admin) (30 October 2024)
The High Court refused a stay of judicial review claims challenging the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 and lifted stays on related claims.
Explore more
