Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Employer equal pay appeal partly succeeded: the EAT upheld most findings on particular disadvantage and direct discrimination, but overturned the basic pay justification analysis.
The primary facts found by the Employment Tribunal could not logically support an inference that the delay in providing feedback was because of the claimant's race. The Tribunal took into account irrelevant factors, and the burden of proof did not shift to the respondent. The appeal is allowed and the finding of discrimination is set aside.
Source excerpt
The EAT dismissed Mr Nowak’s appeal against rejection of race discrimination and victimisation claims, and found no live Working Time Regulations complaint.
The EAT dismissed an appeal against case management decisions, holding that the tribunal was entitled to remove a July 2018 meeting issue and exclude parts of a reply statement.
County Court judgment on alleged race and religion discrimination and victimisation in Conservative Party candidate approval and disciplinary proceedings.
Arif v Baker & Ors [2026] EWCC 14 (02 April 2026)
County Court Equality Act claim arising from a Conservative Party dispute over approval, selection, discipline, and re-expulsion. The court addressed discrimination, victimisation, and limitation.
Employment Tribunal claim by a curate alleging whistleblowing detriments and perceived-disability discrimination was dismissed; some disclosures were protected, but causation and timing failed.
The Court of Appeal refused to reopen a permission decision in an employment discrimination case, holding there was no inconsistency with Higgs and no CPR 52.30 basis.
Omooba v Michael Garrett Associates Ltd (t/a Global Artists) & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 253 (13 March 2026)
The Court of Appeal refused to reopen permission to appeal in a discrimination and contract dispute arising from an actress’s dismissal from a theatre production.
The Tribunal found it necessary in the interests of justice to reconsider and correct the Conley Judgment, clarified which complaints succeeded, amended clerical errors, and removed reasoning relating to compensation based on claimant's conduct as the hearing was for liability only.
Source excerpt
Explore more
