Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a nurse’s appeal against NMC findings, holding the panel’s reasoning and evidential approach were unfair and procedurally irregular.
The High Court dismissed barrister John Stenhouse’s appeal against BSB disciplinary findings for sending emails alleging secret collusion and a cover-up.
The Court of Appeal held that a breach of SRA Principle 7 and Outcome 7.5 requires conduct serious enough to amount to professional misconduct, not any regulatory breach.
The Privy Council upheld leave for judicial review in a Trinidad and Tobago disciplinary case, holding the statutory appeal scheme was not an effective alternative remedy.
Chief Constable of Derbyshire Constabulary, R (On the Application Of) v Police Misconduct Panel [2026] EWHC 467 (Admin) (09 February 2026)
The High Court quashed the sanction imposed by a police misconduct panel, finding inadequate reasoning for final written warnings, but upheld its findings on the officers' conduct.
Prior & Anor, R (on the application of) v The Police Federation of England and Wales [2026] EWHC 124 (Admin) (26 January 2026)
Judicial review of PFEW disciplinary decisions succeeded for Mr Prior in full and partly for Mr Cooke, with the court finding procedural unfairness and Article 10 defects.
The tribunal extended an interim suspension order against a residential childcare worker for six months, finding the public protection and public interest tests remained met.
The Upper Tribunal allowed SAK’s appeal against a DBS barring decision, finding mistakes of fact in the allegations of sleeping on duty and poor care.
Permission for judicial review is refused because the claim was not issued promptly, there is a suitable and more appropriate alternative remedy by statutory appeal, and the relief sought has become academic as the disciplinary proceedings have concluded.
Source excerpt
None of the appellant's grounds individually or cumulatively established a real possibility of bias or procedural irregularity. The hearing before the Professional Conduct Committee was fair, impartial, and procedurally regular. The appeal is dismissed.
Source excerpt
Explore more
