Nix v Emerdata Ltd
Nix v Emerdata Ltd [2024] EWHC 125 (Comm) (04 January 2024)
There is clear evidence that Mr Nix failed to comply with disclosure obligations regarding electronic messages, and aggravating factors exist, including deletion and zero-filling of devices and misleading assurances. There is a real risk of concealment or destruction of relevant evidence. The imaging order sought is proportionate, with safeguards to protect irrelevant or privileged information. Therefore, an imaging order is justified and appropriate in these circumstances.
Source excerpt
- Disclosure obligations
- Imaging orders
- Preservation of evidence
- Electronic disclosure
- Interlocutory relief