Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tribunal dismissed an EIR appeal about a council summerhouse dispute, holding that the withheld advice and surveyor’s name were personal data protected by regulation 13.
The tribunal dismissed an information rights appeal, holding that Camden could refuse the request as manifestly unreasonable under EIR and vexatious under FOIA.
The request was manifestly unreasonable due to the significant cost and officer resources required to comply, and the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the interest in disclosure. The Council's and Commissioner's handling of the request was procedurally fair, and regulation 12(4)(b) was correctly applied.
Source excerpt
The Tribunal found that the Trust does not hold the specific information requested by Mr Mitchell within the meaning of the EIR. The fact that the Trust may hold information used by others to estimate deaths linked to air pollution does not mean the Trust itself holds the requested information. The Decision Notice was not wrong in law or discretion.
Source excerpt
On the balance of probabilities, Westminster City Council did not hold the requested information at the time of the request, and was not required to provide further advice or assistance beyond what was given. The Information Commissioner's Decision Notice was in accordance with the law.
Source excerpt
The tribunal allowed this EIR appeal in part, ordering disclosure of information on money already spent on the berth 4/5 project, but allowing withholding of future cost information.
The Tribunal allowed an information rights appeal in part, ordering disclosure of a building control certificate with the surveyor’s name and signature redacted.
The Tribunal partly allowed an EIR appeal against TfL, ordering disclosure of slides 62–73, but otherwise upheld withholding and dismissed the rest.
The Tribunal dismissed linked EIR appeals about planning-enforcement information from Bracknell Forest Borough Council, upholding refusal under regulations 12(4)(e) and 12(5)(d).
The Tribunal refused Reg Oliver’s appeal, upholding a refusal of information requests about traffic regulation orders and signage as vexatious and manifestly unreasonable.
Explore more
