Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Tribunal held that the applicant did not consent to the restriction on her title and directed its removal. The respondent’s claim of written or oral consent failed.
The Tribunal was entitled to accept the claimant's unchallenged evidence regarding the car keys incident and to consider the totality of conduct; nothing in Tui UK Limited v. Griffiths precluded this approach.
Source excerpt
Care proceedings fact-finding judgment finding neglect, excessive chores, and physical harm by F, but no finding that F viewed child abuse images or that M was sexually gratified.
The court found, on the balance of probabilities and considering all evidence holistically, that the Father sexually abused A as alleged, supported by A's consistent communications, forensic DNA evidence indicating sexual activity, the Father's conduct and internet searches, and the lack of credible innocent explanation for the DNA findings.
Source excerpt
The Upper Tribunal allowed HET’s appeal against DBS barring decisions, found multiple mistakes of fact, and ordered her removal from both barred lists.
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that the father perpetrated a pattern of physical assaults, coercive and controlling behaviour, emotional and financial abuse against the mother, and caused injury to the child L through careless conduct. The findings were based on the consistency and credibility of the mother's evidence, corroboration by a third party, photographic and audio evidence, and the father's lack of credible alternative explanations.
Source excerpt
The Upper Tribunal held that post-decision evidence could not be used to justify limiting a PIP award to a fixed period, and set aside the First-tier Tribunal decision.
The Upper Tribunal set aside First-tier Tribunal child maintenance decisions for inadequate reasoning and procedural unfairness, and remitted the cases for rehearing.
The Upper Tribunal allowed a PIP appeal, finding the First-tier Tribunal erred in law by deciding the case on the papers without properly considering an oral hearing.
Cheshire West and Chester Council v C & Ors [2025] EWFC 434 (B) (02 October 2025)
Care proceedings concerning A and B. The court found threshold established for A, but not sexual abuse by D. A remains in residential care; B will transition back to D.
Explore more
