Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal over a 16-week sentence, removed the direction that it run consecutively, granted an extension of time, and held it was served.
Summary judgment was granted for the defendants on liability for Claim 2. The court held Persimmon had no realistic prospect of proving an extension of time.
The Tribunal refused an application to admit a late appeal against cancellation of registration, finding no exceptional circumstances to extend time.
The High Court dismissed the claim against Mr Mandelli, holding the pleaded facts did not show he personally assumed responsibility to the Claimants.
Permission to apply for judicial review was refused because the claim against the Home Office was premature, no final deportation decision had been made, and alternative remedies existed. The claims against the Secretary of State for Justice regarding prison categorisation and HDC were lawfully based on ongoing deportation proceedings, with no exceptional circumstances established. No arguable merit was found in any grounds, so extension of time and interim relief were also refused.
Source excerpt
The applicant's grounds for appeal are not arguable, and there is no merit in granting the extension of time; therefore, the application is refused and the appeal dismissed.
Source excerpt
Extension of time granted for first appeal due to minor error in document submission and substantial impairment from mental ill-health, supported by medical evidence and absence of prejudice. Extension refused for costs appeal due to lack of grounds, excessive delay, and insufficient justification.
Source excerpt
The EAT held that the tribunal wrongly refused Car Sales Solutions’ reconsideration application and remitted it to a different Employment Judge.
The High Court refused an extension of time for service in a section 288 planning statutory review, holding that late service on the interested parties defeated jurisdiction.
Arun District Council v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors [2026] EWHC 1172 (Admin) (15 May 2026)
The High Court refused Arun District Council permission for section 288 review after late service on the developers deprived the court of jurisdiction.
Explore more
