Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
High Court appeal in a property ownership dispute admitted fresh evidence, set aside the forgery finding on the trust deed, and remitted the case for retrial.
UAB Business Enterprise & Anor v Oneta Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 543 (Ch) (11 March 2026)
The High Court rejected claims to rectify Oneta Limited’s register and reinstate a director, finding the settlement agreement genuine and supported by the evidence.
The High Court dismissed Patricia Kelly-Lambo’s application to set aside a 2018 costs order for alleged fraud, holding the route was procedurally wrong and the alleged forgery evidence was not material.
The Upper Tribunal refused fresh evidence in a rent repayment order appeal, holding the documents could with reasonable diligence have been produced earlier.
Burdett v Burdett & Anor [2025] EWHC 480 (Ch) (04 March 2025)
The court dismissed Sheila Burdett’s unfair prejudice petition and David Burdett’s trust claim over 72 High Street after a trial on disputed family company documents.
Kang v Freshacre Properties Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 487 (Ch) (04 March 2025)
The High Court allowed an appeal and ordered a retrial after finding the trial had been rendered unfair by unpleaded allegations that key documents were forged.
Franny Investments Ltd v Olajide & Ors [2025] EWHC 92 (KB) (21 January 2025)
The High Court refused renewed interim injunctions over a disputed residential property, holding that the county court was the proper forum for possession and related disputes.
The court dismissed a claim that US$30 million was an oral loan, finding the evidence instead supported the Defendants’ explanation that it was a service fee.
The appeal was dismissed because Mr Taylor had not issued a claim to set aside the default judgment for fraud, had not provided a properly particularised case, and the evidence adduced did not demonstrate a strong or credible case of fraud. The court found the allegations of forgery lacked conviction, were inconsistent with earlier positions, and were commercially implausible. The judge's exercise of discretion to refuse a stay was upheld.
Source excerpt
Invest Bank PSC v El-Husseini & Ors [2024] EWHC 1804 (Comm) (12 July 2024)
The Commercial Court refused relief from sanctions for a late Notice to Prove, holding the Bank’s authenticity challenge to a divorce agreement was out of time and served no useful purpose.
Explore more
