Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Abbott & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2026] EWHC 941 (KB) (24 April 2026)
High Court group litigation judgment on military NIHL claims, resolving generic issues on diagnosis, quantification, tinnitus, hearing aids, and related losses.
High Court judgment in a military noise-induced hearing loss group action, addressing diagnosis, quantification, tinnitus, de minimis injury, and related damages issues.
Limbu & Ors v Dyson Technology Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 38 (KB) (14 January 2026)
Case management decision in migrant-worker claims against Dyson: the court orders lead claimants and a liability trial, but excludes unjust enrichment for now.
Hughes & Ors v World Rugby Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 3382 (KB) (22 December 2025)
Appeals in rugby head injury litigation were dismissed. The High Court upheld unless orders and disclosure directions in multi-party proceedings, holding no prior default finding was required.
Pan-NOx Emissions Group Litigation (Funding Information and Disclosure Hearing 21 November 2025) [2025] EWHC 3116 (KB) (21 November 2025)
The High Court ordered Johnson Law Group to disclose funding information in the Pan-NOx group litigation, subject to adequate ATE insurance, and set a 64% coverage benchmark.
White & Ors v Uber London Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 2972 (Comm) (22 October 2025)
The High Court ordered a preliminary limitation issue, approved a representative sample of 20 claimants, and made a costs budgeting order in a £340 million group action against Uber entities.
The court determined that the majority of claimants' budgets were excessive, particularly due to duplication of work, over-lawyering, and inefficient communication. Costs were reduced to figures broadly in line with defendants' offers, with further reductions where both sides' budgets were deemed generous. The court applied a 20% tolerance for reasonable and proportionate costs, deferred budgeting for expert reports and ADR/settlement phases, and emphasised that only costs necessary for efficient litigation should be recoverable.
Source excerpt
The High Court ordered unredacted pleadings and witness statements in NOx emissions litigation, holding that technical redactions were not justified against open justice.
Município De Mariana v BHP Group (UK) Ltd [2025] EWHC 1771 (TCC) (11 July 2025)
The court partly allowed amendments to pleadings in the Mariana dam-collapse litigation, refused pleaded reliance on Brazilian settlement provisions, and adjourned security for costs.
Although Brazil has the most real and substantial connection to the claims, there is a real risk that claimants will not be able to obtain substantial justice there due to the economics of litigation, limited funding options, and the absence of viable CFA or legal aid arrangements for lawyers' fees; undertakings by defendants do not remedy this risk. Therefore, the English court should retain jurisdiction and refuse a stay.
Source excerpt
Explore more
