Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
On the balance of probabilities, the appellant's conduct fell below professional standards required of an ADI, undermining public confidence in the Register. The appellant is not a fit and proper person to remain on the Register.
Source excerpt
The court granted a declaration of non-parentage, step-parent adoption, and judicial review relief for DZ, but refused to declare FZ DZ’s father under the HFEA 2008.
The Ramsay doctrine does not defeat the Dry Tax Charge because s381 ITTOIA 2005 requires a single transaction view; the QCB discounts and premiums are income in nature as they compensate for foregone interest; the discovery assessment is valid as the hypothetical officer could not have been aware of the insufficiency from the information provided; the HICBC does not breach the Appellant’s human rights as it is lawful, proportionate, and non-discriminatory.
Source excerpt
The High Court struck out a claim against the Metropolitan Police and granted summary judgment, holding the pleaded causes of action were bound to fail.
Mahal v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2025] EWHC 2791 (KB) (30 October 2025)
The High Court struck out a claim against the Metropolitan Police and granted summary judgment, holding the pleaded causes of action were abusive, misconceived, or without real prospect.
The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to entertain Mr Andrew’s appeal because permission to appeal was not obtained from the trial judge as required by section 68(4) Arbitration Act 1996. The findings against Mr Andrew were within the pleaded case, put to him in cross-examination, and he had full opportunity to respond. There was no breach of Articles 6 or 8 ECHR. The process was fair, reasons were adequate, and the findings were justified. Even if jurisdiction existed, permission to appeal would be refused on discretionary grounds.
Source excerpt
Sheffield Environmental Services & Ors v Persons Unknown [2025] EWHC 2141 (KB) (13 August 2025)
The High Court granted an injunction against persons unknown blocking Veolia’s Sheffield sites during industrial action, finding private nuisance, minimal trespass, and adequate service.
The claims against the CPS and police are barred by core immunity and its established extensions, which apply to statements made in court and preparatory conduct for court proceedings, including bail hearings. The immunity applies to all causes of action, including HRA and DPA claims, unless Parliament expressly abrogates it. The respondent did not meet the section 7 victim criterion under HRA, as there was no real and immediate risk at the material time.
Source excerpt
The Supreme Court upheld sanctions against Eugene Shvidler and the detention of the yacht Phi, holding the measures proportionate, lawful, and supported by adequate reasons.
The judge's refusal of interim relief was legally correct, as he properly weighed the balance of convenience, gave due respect to national security, and considered all relevant factors; no arguable error of law or basis for appellate interference was established.
Source excerpt
Explore more
