Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court rejected a contract claim for a broker fee but held DMA Resources was entitled in unjust enrichment to a 5% commission on RCF’s equity investment.
The court held that Project Red Card was a joint venture, not a solicitor-client retainer, so Global Sports Data was not liable for IPS Law’s claimed fees.
ABC v DEF [2025] EWHC 711 (Comm) (19 March 2025)
The High Court declared that the claimant was not bound by the arbitration agreements in two supply contracts and awarded costs on the standard basis.
The tribunal was correct to find no implied contract between the appellant and KPMG, but erred in striking out claims under section 47B ERA and sections 13, 26, and 112 EqA, as KPMG could potentially be liable without a direct contractual relationship; fact-sensitive issues regarding agency and aiding contraventions require a full hearing and cannot be determined on strike out.
Source excerpt
Emirates Shipping Line DMCES v Gold Star Line Ltd [2023] EWHC 880 (Comm) (25 April 2023)
The High Court held that a slot purchase contract was separate from a 2018 MOU and that no estoppel or incorporation of its arbitration clause was shown.
Fenchurch Advisory Partners Llp v AA Ltd [2023] EWHC 108 (Comm) (24 January 2023)
Commercial Court fee dispute over Project Zodiac. The court held no binding contract was formed, but Fenchurch recovered a reasonable fee in restitution.
The High Court held no binding contract was formed, but awarded Fenchurch restitution for services valued at £350,000 plus expenses, rejecting any success fee.
Commercial Court judgment on maritime indemnities, holding that discharge orders triggered enforceable deemed indemnities and an implied internal indemnity within the charter chain.
Excession Technologies Ltd v Police Digital Service [2022] EWHC 413 (TCC) (25 February 2022)
The High Court held that a police surveillance procurement fell within the intelligence-activities exemption, time-barred one pricing complaint, and found no implied tender contract.
The High Court held that an implied retainer and quantum meruit case had not been properly pleaded, causing procedural unfairness. The appeal was allowed and the matter remitted for retrial.
Explore more
