Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The tribunal did not err in refusing reinstatement or re-engagement, in its assessment of injury to feelings, or in its approach to mitigation of loss. The tribunal erred only in failing to award interest on compensation for discrimination, which is now ordered.
Source excerpt
The tribunal erred in treating allegation 6 (harassment by Ms Swift) as no longer live without clear withdrawal or strike out, and failed to determine that complaint; however, the tribunal did not err in its adjudication of other complaints, its reasoning for injury to feelings was sufficient, and its decision not to award interest was within its discretion given the compensation awarded.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that a Crown Court appeal under the police pensions regulations can cover backdated injury pension entitlement, and it upheld interest.
Commercial Court decision dismissing an FOB sale and GAFTA arbitration appeal and section 68 challenge over vessel nomination, charterparty disclosure, and interest.
Ministry of Defence & Support for Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v International Military Services Ltd [2020] EWCA Civ 145 (12 February 2020)
The Court of Appeal held that EU sanctions prevented MODSAF from enforcing post-award interest for the sanctions period, but not the principal award.
Judicial review concerning police injury pension backdating, jurisdiction under Regulation 34, and interest on awards under the 2006 Regulations.
Chief Constable Of South Yorkshire Police, R (on the application of) v The Crown Court At Sheffield & Anor [2020] EWHC 210 (Admin) (06 February 2020)
Judicial review of a Crown Court police pension appeal. The High Court upheld backdating of Mr Kelly’s injury pension but set aside the award of interest.
The High Court held that EU sanctions barred MODSAF from enforcing post-award interest for the sanctions period, and that Article 42 did not apply.
Ministry of Defence & Support for Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v International Military Services Ltd [2019] EWHC 1994 (Comm) (24 July 2019)
The High Court held that EU sanctions barred MODSAF from enforcing post-award interest for the sanctions period, and that Article 42 did not apply.
The Cultural Foundation & Anor v Beazley Furlonge Ltd & Ors [2018] EWHC 2185 (Comm) (15 August 2018)
Costs judgment after preliminary issues in an insurance dispute over professional indemnity cover, set-off of defence costs, and post-award interest.
Explore more
