Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Commercial Court granted summary judgment to Nordic Power Partners in a dispute over sale proceeds from Brazilian solar projects under an English-law cooperation agreement.
Nordic Power Partners P/S & Ors v Rio Alto Energia, Empreendimentos E Participacoes LTDA & Ors [2026] EWHC 806 (Comm) (01 April 2026)
The High Court granted summary judgment to the claimants, holding they were contractually entitled to 100% of sale proceeds under a waterfall mechanism.
Abraaj Investment Management Ltd & Ors v KES Power Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 65 (Comm) (16 January 2026)
Commercial Court decision on a disputed KES Power debt under a consultancy agreement, addressing expiry, assignment, consent, estoppel, and expense reimbursement.
The claimant's case is not so patently flawed or unarguable as to justify strike out or summary judgment; the contractual issues are complex and require detailed analysis at trial.
Source excerpt
The appellant was bound by Camelot’s terms and conditions, which were properly incorporated via click-wrap and hyperlinks. The Game Procedures and IWG Rules made clear that only one prize could be won per play, and the outcome was determined by Camelot’s computer system. The appellant won £10, not £1 million. The relevant terms were not unfair or unenforceable under the UTCCR.
Source excerpt
KIMA was not a commercial agent for the purpose of the Palestinian Commercial Agents Law because it bought and sold vehicles in its own name and for its own account, bore the financial risk and profit, and was not remunerated by Opel by commission or profit margin. Therefore, KIMA was not entitled to compensation under article 15 of the Commercial Agents Law, and its claim for a declaration was dismissed.
Source excerpt
The Privy Council held that CWJ, not Traille, was liable for TCT, could include it in the security deposit, and could refuse connection until the correct deposit was paid.
Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd v National Power Parks Management Company (Private) Ltd [2023] EWHC 316 (Comm) (15 February 2023)
The High Court dismissed a section 68 Arbitration Act challenge to LCIA awards arising from gas supply contracts, and upheld the tribunal’s interest award.
The Commercial Court held that a family shipping agreement’s indemnity clause expired around 1 September 2015 and dismissed the claim for shortfall and trading losses.
The Upper Tribunal held that a transfer to a connected company was a disposal under a pre-emption agreement, but the sale terms were less favourable, so the rights survived.
Explore more
