Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
England and Wales decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Miss Msomi succeeds to the extent of ÂŁ9,800 delivered to Terence Morgan and held on trust for the purpose of purchasing a property for Mrs Morgan; Mrs Morgan fails to prove beneficial ownership of ÂŁ20,000 cash and her claim is dismissed.
Source excerpt
Kanabar v Kanabar [2026] EWCA Civ 582 (15 May 2026)
The Court of Appeal held that a financial remedy appeal could not proceed without a personal representative for the deceased appellant's estate, and restored the district judge's order.
The Court of Appeal held that a financial remedy appeal could not proceed without a legal representative for the deceased appellant’s estate, and restored the district judge’s order.
The High Court construed a will clause giving residue to “the daughter of Lily Mason” and held the gift referred to Lily Mason’s two daughters in equal shares.
Winehouse v Parry & Anor [2026] EWHC 911 (KB) (20 April 2026)
High Court trial over disputed Amy Winehouse property sold at auction, considering ownership, gifts, conversion, limitation, and fiduciary duty.
Ugolor & Ors v Ugolor & Anor [2026] EWHC 745 (Ch) (27 March 2026)
The High Court refused probate of a disputed will, finding that although capacity was not disproved, knowledge and approval were not established.
Probate claim challenging a homemade will succeeded on knowledge and approval. The court upheld testamentary capacity but found the will invalid and ordered intestacy.
Gill v Gill & Anor (Re the Estate of Pal Singh Gill) [2026] EWHC 848 (Ch) (03 February 2026)
The High Court upheld the 2011 will of Pal Singh Gill, finding he knew and approved it and that it was not procured by undue influence.
The court found that at the time of giving instructions and executing his will, Michael Gwilliam was suffering from an insane delusion or disorder of the mind arising from a mental disease, which was fixed and incapable of contrary persuasion and had a causative effect on his testamentary dispositions, precluding him from properly considering the claims of his daughters. The will was therefore void for want of testamentary capacity. The claim of fraudulent calumny failed because, although Sheila and Joan made statements to Michael about his daughters, they genuinely believed them and were not…
Source excerpt
Ginger & Ors v Mickleburgh & Ors [2026] EWHC 100 (Ch) (23 January 2026)
Probate dispute over Michael Gwilliam’s 2014 will. The court found he lacked testamentary capacity because of delusions and also found fraudulent calumny.
Explore more
